Lord Of The Flies Literature Critique Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper Throughout Chapters six, seven, and eight, Golding concentrating on Simon for being alone, and different from the other male childs. He depicts Simon as a black sheep in which the other male child # 8217 ; s disfavor. One such illustration is that the other male child # 8217 ; s are ever doing merriment of him, and despite that, Simon neer retaliates with returning verbal onslaughts. One large difference in Simon from the other male child # 8217 ; s, is that Simon does non fear the animal. Simon knows that animal is the immorality within, but Simon is pure. Simon is besides about saintly, for case, when Simon fed the small kids, this is a saintly gesture. This besides shows that Simon is the lone 1 who isn # 8217 ; Ts concerned with merely him, but he cares for the well being of the others excessively. Another illustration of Simon # 8217 ; s pureness is when the Lord of the Flies tempts him. We will write a custom essay sample on Lord Of The Flies Literature Critique Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He falls unconsciously to avoid the persuasion and enticement of immorality. Simon is the obvious fulcrum in the good and bad spectrum. On one terminal ballad Ralph, and on the other terminal lay Jack. One thing that Golding does is making Simon as a Christ-like figure. Simon is the purest of all the male childs. Simon does non follow orders, nor does he give them. He will non perpetrate Acts of the Apostless of force, nor will he diss the male childs who insult him. Golding is invariably giving Simon more and more Christ-like features and traits. From the pureness of his bosom, to the Lord of the Files trying to allure him. Another thing Golding does frequently, is use the literary tool of symbolism. Almost all of the of import facets of the book involve symbolism. Simon symbolizes a Christ-like figure. The Lord of the Flies symbolizes the Satan. When Simon fell unconscious, that represented the forfeits that had to be made in order to get the better of immorality. The last major symbolism was Ralph and Simon mounting the stones, in which Simon finished foremost. That was to demo that although Ralph has leading and power, Simon is the 1 who should be taking. He has the pureness an d the bosom to make it. Another literary tool used by Golding is apposition. Golding juxtaposes good and evil, Satan and Christ, life and decease, world and dreams, Heaven and Hell, and so on. The intent of this was to demo that the things that need to be done in order to last must be accomplished through the antonym. For case, The male child # 8217 ; s redemption ( heaven ) lies in the custodies of the fire ( snake pit ) that will signal a deliverance ship. Another case is the Lord of the Flies ( Satan ) speaking and alluring Simon ( Christ ) , like what happened in the desert in which Christ was stuck in for 40 yearss. Golding intentionally composes Simon as a Christ-like figure, but more significantly juxtaposes the pure good of Simon following to many signifiers of Evil. Among those evil signifiers lay fire, enticement, autarchy, killing, verbal blasting, animals, and Satan. The chief immorality signifiers nevertheless lay in the fire, the bossy regulation, and the animal. First, the fire: The fire acts as a redemption from the evil island, freedom. To accomplish freedom, one must utilize the prisoner of war ers of evil. The fire represents not only physical salvation, but also mental salvation for Simon as well. Simon must mentally overcome the fire’s salvation. He cannot be tempted by evil he must use his purity in order to obtain complete salvation. If Simon did fall to the dark forces of evil, he would surely be off the island or would he? He would live the remainder of his life pondering over what would have happened if he stuck with good. He fell for evil and because of it he never achieved mental salvation, his mind would forever live on the island. The next major evil is the autocratic rule imposed on by Ralph and Jack. They represent the very rulers who sent Christ to the hill to be crucified. They wanted complete control over the people and their beliefs, as do Jack and Ralph. They will send Simon to his grave, perhaps not on a cross, but they will send Simon to his final grave. Unfortunately, the good versus evil battles which are fought, will usually be won by bad in the beginning, and hopefully fall in the end. In history, Christ was killed when he was the good. Hitler killed the Jews, when Hitler was the evil one. Ralph and jack will kill Simon, when he is the good one. Through out history, it shows that in order for the bad to make themselves look good, they must destroy those who are really good. The last evil form I will focus on is the beast. The reason why Simon is never afraid of the beast, but the others are, is because, Simon is the beast. The beast is not really evil; he is viewed as evil. The beast is really the good, Simon, the purist of all. To the bad, the good is bad; thus Simon is viewed as the beast. Not a flying animal, or a huge squid, but the pure white heart of a human being is the real beast in the eyes of the evil. Not all the boys are evil, but if they follow the autocratic ways of Ralph or Jack, they have been corrupted by evil. In a sense, what are viewed as far as the beast, are complete opposites. The beast, which i s viewed as bad, is in fact good. The bad now fears the good, where as usually the good fear the bad. It is one big paradox with good and evil. Why are the bad so fearsome of the beast which is good, since there is an overwhelming amount of the bad, opposed to just one pure good character? Perhaps evil knows, and has always known that good will prevail over evil, despite circumstances. I feel that evil fear the good beast only because it poses a threat to the autocratic rule of the evil island. In my opinion, Lord of the Flies creates a new Ying yang, one of all black (evil) and only one small dot of white (good). The black represents all the evil on the island, and the small white dot symbolizes Simon, the one small bit of pure white good. Despite the temptations and overwhelming amount of evil to good, the small bit of good will never give up. Good fights and lives until it is destroyed, but will never surrender over to the dark side. If the world should ever become this Ying yang , what will happen when the good is swallowed by the evil?

GMOs essays

GMO's essays GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms What do people really know about GMOs? Do they know that some of them may in the long run be harmful? Do they know that with the use of these GMOs, stronger herbicides will need to be made in order to prevent the growth of super weeds? GMOs are something that need to be looked into and people should have the choice to use these modified items or not. Many countries have strict laws about GMOs, but the U.S. does not, why is that? Most of the countries feel that genetically engineered vegetable and fruits are not safe. Eating these GMOs have not yet been proven harmful, but there are scientist out there who believe that over a long term that may cause serious diseases to spread and more virulent forms of viruss to be formed. The USDA and FDA have not yet proven these GMOs harmful or dangerous. However, scientists have shown these GMOs are producing super weeds and more virulent viruses. Should we be forced to eat these GMOs without knowing or should we have a choice in what we eat? There is an upside to using these genetically engineered foods though, and that is they could possibly end world hunger in the future if people choose to eat them. The advanced growth of corn and salmon are promising when it comes to providing food for more people than you can physically feed. People should have the right to eat GMOs or not. The U.S. should follow some of the countries like Austria and put labels on food using GMOs so that the consumer knows what they are buying. A consumer should not be forced to eat something they feel will someday hurt them. GMOs need to be researched more before they are used in the food; we as the consumer choose to eat, on an everyday basis. ...

Analysis of Demand and Supply for Ford SUVs and Trucks

Analysis of Demand and Supply for Ford SUVs and Trucks This paper will discuss the analysis of Demand and Supply for Ford’s SUVs and trucks. Particularly the larger SUVs and Trucks. What is demand and supply analysis? It â€Å"is the study of how buyers and sellers interact to determine transaction prices and quantities.† (Demand and Supply Analysis: Introduction, 2011). It might be hard to believe that the big SUVs and trucks sells are on the rise while all sedans sales are plummeting in ever category. Half a decade ago SUVs and trucks sells were rock bottom but with the current economy, low gas prices, low interest rates, and the average income is on the rise, people are opting for the larger vehicles. Ford is one manufacture that is going to take advantage of the new demand shift. Ford has opted out of making any more sedans and to only to make SUVs and trucks. Ford will keep two sedans which is the Ford Focus and the Ford Mustang their best sellers. Ford plans to introduce new SUVs and Trucks to cover more of the market segments, because not ever consumer can afford Fords top tier line that cost upwards of seventy to eighty thousand dollars. The Analysis of Demand and Supply. Less than five years ago car manufacturers were on a race to improve fuel economy. This was mostly due to the high gas prices. From around 2011 until late 2014 going into 2015 gas prices averaged over $3.50 a gallon and high average just over $4.00 dollars a gallon. The above chart is from (Gas Price Charts, 2018). According to data from the U.S. Department of Transportation, the average American driver puts in 13,474 miles behind the wheel each year. So, if U.S. consumer was to by a large SUV that got a combine average of 18mpg and at $4 dollars a gallon it would have cost the consumer $2,994 dollars. However, if the consumer was to buy a car that got closer to 40mpgs it would have cost the consumer $1,347.4 dollars. This would have saved the consumer on average $137 dollars a month just in gas not to mention that the smaller cars cost less. Gas was a significant factor but there were other factors such as economic confidence was down, the average American’s salary was stagnate and even declining. During the time frame 2010 to 2016 consumers were spending less. The economic environment has changed, and the economy has strengthened over the last two years. Gas prices are lower with the current national average of $2.84. At the current gas price and with the larger SUVs and Trucks peaking around 20mpgs it would currently cost the consumer $1,913 dollars in gas, this is a thousand dollars a year savings. Other factors driving consumers spending more on cars are Americans have more economic confidence and American wages are on the rise. According to USA Today â€Å"U.S. workers’ wages and benefits grew 2.6% last year [2017] the fastest 12-month pace since the spring of 2015.† (Wages rise at 2.6% in 2017, 2017). This means that U.S consumers have a little more money in their pocket and they don’t want the same cars any longer and are willing to spend more to get more. Americans have always been drawn towards larger vehicles more than other nations. Therefore, Ford has made the change to focus more on their SUV line and Truck line. Only two cars survived the chopping block. One thing that is evident with the current new demand is the price. In 2013 the Ford Expedition top out at $51,355 dollars in the top trim level of the King Ranch. Now in 2018 Ford has introduced a remodeled Ford Expedition and the top tier base price is $76,175 dollars. These prices were gathered from Autotrader.com. What caused this massive jump in price in just 5 years. To start out the demand was down because of the recent high gas prices. With the environmental factor such as gas price this will reduce the demand for larger vehicle when there is a alternative vehicle that got better gas mileage and cost tremendously less. As the gas went down and the consumer income went up the demand for these SUVs went up, but the supply was low. Fords parent company Lincoln was selling their high-end Lincoln Navigator but Ford was having a hard time keeping up the demand. In January of 2018 Lincoln sold 1,300 Navigators this number was up 97.5% from January in 2017. Not only was Lincolns sales up but of those 1,300 Navigators sold 84% of them were Lincolns two highest trim level which brought a price of over $90,000 dollars. While everyone might not be able to spend upwards of $80,000 to $90,000 dollars Ford is introducing new models that are smaller but look like an SUV. This move is to capitalize on the current trend that people are moving away form sedans and that the current technology is allowing some of the smaller crossover SUVs to get upwards of the 30mpg range. The ability to get 30mpgs in a SUV will help Ford survive if the gas price was to go up or if the economy was to take a down turn. In the end if the economy is right the U.S. consumer will spend more on their vehicle but if gas goes up and the economy tanks we could see prices fall for the large SUVs and Trucks.

International Terrorism (Answer the questions) Scholarship Essay

International Terrorism (Answer the questions) - Scholarship Essay Example 4. Explain each of Samuel Huntington's 8 cultural paradigms. What does this model for culture and civilization around the world have to do with terrorism What are the implications for law enforcement if terrorism has deeper roots-namely, rooted in a clash of civilizations Also, what are the implications for American foreign policy efforts to thwart terrorism 5. Describe anarchist and socialist movements of the 19th Century. Which activists within those movements were most pivotal in giving us terrorism as we know it today Also, in your own opinion, how should modern America deal with fomenters of political violence when they do so while in exile through writing and speaking Should America "go after" such people given the observation from history that other exiled thinkers/revolutionaries have had great influence with violent and long-standing consequences Terrorism comes from the Latin word for "terror" or "fear", but an objective and universally accepted definition of the word is difficult up to the present moment for the simple reason that what may be seen as frightening or terrifying by the victims of terrorist acts may be seen, from the side of the terrorists and those who support them, as acts of daring, courage, and heroism. This issue of three different perceptions of an act - the terrorist, the victim, and the public - that leads to different understandings and definitions of the act is part of our common experience (Schmid, 1997). For example, a triathlete may see his/her punishing dietary and exercise regimens as forms of discipline to attain success and glory, but a non-triathlete would simply view it as pointless vain masochism. Definitions range from the simple: "the use or threatened use of force designed to bring about political change" (Jenkins, 1985); to the concise: "policy intended to strike with terror those against whom it is adopted; the employment of methods of intimidation" (OED, 2002); and the complex: as in the Patriot Act definition (U.S. Congress, 2001, Sec. 808). The most balanced among the wide range of definitions is proposed by the FBI (1999): "Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." The FBI definition includes the key elements that characterize terrorist acts (Schmid, 1983): (1) use of unlawful violence or force, (2) a political aim, and (3) the main targets are civilians. The point against all other definitions is that these are too specific and contain too many details that clutter understanding (how violent acts are carried out, which systems are used, motives and intentions of perpetrators, etc.). It is unavoidable that in any society, some have grievances they want addressed by observing due processes to preserve social order. The terrorist disrespects the process and performs acts to intimidate society and the ruling power, thinking that the end justifies the means. This mentality is rooted in Machiavelli (1997) and, based on centuries of experience, leads to more intimidation, oppression, less freedom, and more violent

Challenges in reducing the mongoose population Essay - 1

Challenges in reducing the mongoose population - Essay Example For instance, convincing an audience of farmers who are directly affected by the mongoose of the essence of having the mongoose safeguarded may be challenging than convincing other persons who are not direct victims. Similarly, it may be problematic in seeking the full support of authorities and government agencies directly involved in policy making for approval of such a plan of creation of natural conservancy zones for the mongoose instead of allowing them are depleted by being killed by human beings. This is also related with the challenge of communication emanating from disparities along ethnic lines. With such a proposal being based on scientific knowledge, it may become challenging in communicating the information to indigenous tribes especially to the persons who are least learned. Finally, a very fundamental challenge likely to be faced in implementing the proposal is that of inadequacy of existing legal frameworks in the country. There needs to be strategic policies and laws that are formulated to enhance the collaborative efforts of the government and public is such efforts of creating conservancy zones. In conclusion therefore, collaborative efforts between the government agencies as well as the public on such an initiative as establishment of a conservancy zone is dependent on effectiveness in communication, awareness creation and the legal frameworks governing a nation. This therefore explains the likelihood that the above factors may affect the effectiveness of the process of creation of conservancy zones for the mongoose in

Me, Myself, and Why Problem Set Essay Example for Free

Me, Myself, and Why Problem Set Essay 1. What is the difference between self-interest and selfishness? Why is this distinction important when considering the competitive market economy as appropriate for society? Self-interest is looking out for your best interest and finding the best possible alternatives that will benefit yourself in the business world. Selfishness is putting your own interests above the interests of others and making decisions solely based on how they will benefit you. This distinction is imperative in considering the competitive market that is appropriate for society because you need to make sure that you are looking out for yourself but at the same time you should not make market decisions based solely off your own selfish interests. A selfish business man or woman will never be successful in the long run. 2. Does your textbook present only positive economics and avoid any normative economics? If not, give some examples of normative economics covered in your textbook. The textbook presents both positive economics and normative economics. An example of normative economics that is used in the textbook states â€Å"a value-free interpretation [of economics] leads to all sorts of abuses† (42). Normative economics incorporate subjectivity in to their analysis. Normative economics are heavily influenced by value judgment as well as theoretical situations. Normative economics are the opposite of positive economics. 3. What did Adam Smith believe serves to curb self-interest in an economy? â€Å"People care what others think of them and it is this desire for the good opinion of others that constrains people in their pursuit of self-interest† (41). Adam goes on to say, â€Å"this constraint is reinforced by competition and by the jurisprudence system† (41). Smith believes that others opinions shape what they pursue. Smith opposed the exclusive privileges of corporations and even went as far to oppose  regulations such as taxes which he claims gave individuals the ability to gain an unfair advantage. 4. What does it mean to seek the Kingdom of God in a democratic capitalist economy? How can it be done? Capitalism and Christianity can be combined. It may be difficult to combine the two because many Christians believe that it is better to always put the interests of others before yourself. However, Christ calls us to be good stewards of what He has given us and it is important to be good business men and woman that strive to be warriors for the Lord. Christ has not called us to be mediocre but to rise to the top and to shine for Him. The book states, â€Å"we’re not perfect, but we can strive to act righteously with in a system that accommodates both vice and virtue† (50).

The honor code Essay -- essays research papers

How will the honor code impact my academic and campus life?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Throughout my years at Xavier and beyond I intend to follow the Xavier Honor Code so I can become a cooperative and responsible person. By being a student at Xavier I notice I will have to take responsibility of my actions and faults. In order for Xavier to trust me and to allow me to continue attending their school, I will have to follow their rules and be respectful. Not only should I do these things, but also I have to respect myself in order to respect others. In following the Honor Code at Xavier I will learn more about others, the school, and myself. The Honor Code will impact my academic and campus life because it will lead my way to the future by becoming a successful young black woman.  ...